Now that the film maker has lead the watcher into a certain mindset, it is time to kick it up a notch.
The film maker claims there are many "astrological-astronomical metaphors" in the Bible, but provides no evidence to back this up. He then goes on to talk about how age is really a metaphor for the astrological ages such as Aries and Pisces. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest such, and we will discuss this further in a bit.
- numerology calculator based on date of birth 29 march.
- The Sacred Page: Zeitgeist Movie: Is Christianity a Recycled Version of other Pagan Myths??
- SPEAKING INVITATIONS.
It makes various claims about the zodiac and the length of ages, while these claims are not necessarily inaccurate, they prove very little when discussing the Bible. Now, the Bible reflects, broadly speaking, a symbolic movement through 3 ages, while foreshadowing a 4th. In the Old Testament when Moses comes down Mount Sinai with the 10 Commandments, he is very upset to see his people worshiping a golden bull calf. In fact, he shattered the stone tablets and instructed his people to kill each other in order to purify themselves.
Most Biblical scholars would attribute this anger to the fact that the Israelites were worshiping a false idol, or something to that effect. This is why Jews even today still blow the Ram's horn. Moses represents the new Age of Aries, and upon the new age, everyone must shed the old age. Other deities mark these transitions as well, a pre-Christian god who kills the bull, in the same symbology. The film maker discusses that Moses came down from Mount Sinai with this 10 commandments and smashed them because he saw his people worshipping a bull, but in reality that bull was Taurus.
According to the film, Moses represents the new age of Aries, and that's why Moses was angry. It goes on to say that because Moses represents Aries the ram, that is why Jews blow the ram's horn.
It is far more likely that the reason Jews use the ram's horn is because they raised sheep, and a horn can be easily made into an instrument [ 51 ]. These claims cannot be substantiated with history either, primarily because the movie says the age Aries was from BC to 1 AD, however the earliest dates given by scholars for Exodus does not place it until over years after the Age began [ 52 ], a little late for Moses to start a new age and get angry that nobody else had caught on.
Fish symbolism is very abundant in the New Testament. Jesus feeds 5, people with bread and "2 fish. And I think we've all seen the Jesus-fish on the backs of people's cars. Little do they know what it actually means. Also, Jesus' assumed birth date is essentially the start of this age. Just like with Moses we run into various problems with the claims stated in the film. The Age of Pisces is represented by two fish, but the film maker chooses his words carefully. He gleefully mentions that Jesus fed 5, people with 2 fish, but he chooses not to mention the amount of bread.
The passage in the Bible says "We only have five loaves of bread and two fish". It also is not out of the ordinary that fish is mentioned, it was a very common food staple in the region. Therefore, if someone were to have food, it would have probably been bread and fish. It goes on to say that the fish symbol on the back of people's cars is actually a pagan astrological symbol for the "Sun's Kingdom during the Age of Pisces". However, the true meaning behind the fish does not fit the parallel with the zodiac they are trying to make.
At Luke when Jesus is asked by his disciples where the next passover will be after he is gone , Jesus replied: "Behold, when ye are entered into the city, there shall a man meet you bearing a pitcher of water The man bearing a pitcher of water is Aquarius, the water-bearer, who is always pictured as a man pouring out a pitcher of water. The film talks about a passage in the Bible and claims it is "by far one of the most revealing of all the astrological references. While the reply from Jesus is correct, the question the disciples ask is not. The film maker claims that the man bearing the pitcher that Jesus is talking about, actually symbolizes the Age of Aquarius.
Luke is accurately quoted [ 55 ], but let's take a closer look at the disciples' question. Like states the following: "Then came the first day of Unleavened Bread on which the Passover lamb had to be sacrificed [ 56 ]. As stated above, the disciples are not asking about where the next Passover will be, but rather where they would be eating that night. Aside from that though, the symbolism put forth by the movie is also inaccurate.
SCHEDULE A CROSS EXAMINED SPEAKER
The movie describes Aquarius as "always pictured as a man pouring out a pitcher of water", however in the passage from the Bible, the man is not pouring the water, but carrying it. If is the symbolic reference that the movie claims, why is the symbolism incorrect? Now, we have all heard about the end times and the end of the world. Apart from the cartoonish depictions in the Book of Revelation, the main source of this idea comes from Matthew , where Jesus says "I will be with you even to the end of the world.source link
Zeitgeist, the Movie – Christianity versus the Pagan Mystery Religions
The actual word being used is "aeon", which means "age. The entire concept of end times and the end of the world is a misinterpreted astrological allegory. Let's tell that to the approximately million people in America who believe the end of the world is coming. The movie makes claims that the King James Version of the Bible has many mistranslations, such as the word "world" is really "aeon" which means "age".
If the King James Version is so incorrect, why are they using it? The only possible reason would be to make a more general attack on the reliability of the translation or so that they can spin words and "mistranslations" however they please.
Is there any validity to the Zeitgeist movie? | diamagfairesczea.ga
So, essentially it is communicating the general idea correctly "even to the end of the world", "even to the end of eternity". I think it is interesting how the film maker dismisses the Book of Revelation as "cartoonish depictions", even though it contains the majority of the end time predictions. It is no doubt because he could not draw a parallel between the zodiac and Revelation, only with Matthew All of the film maker's Biblical arguments work this way, he selects what agrees with him, but ignores everything else.
The film maker also claims that Matthew 28 is the "main source" for Christian knowledge of the end times. Passages in Matthew 24 [ 61 ], 2nd Thessalonians 2 [ 62 ], the book of Daniel [ ], and of course Revelation [ 63a ] are far better sources, but they do not contain the parallels that the film maker wanted to make, so they are ignored. Let's not forget that the King James Bible has 31, verses in it[ 63b ], and yet only a few are about the astrological connections between Jesus, God, the Zodiac, and so forth?
If the book is an astrological document, one would figure there'd be more. Furthermore, the character of Jesus, a literary and astrological hybrid, is most explicitly a plagiarization of the Egyptian Sun-god Horus. For example, inscribed about years ago , on the walls of the Temple of Luxor in Egypt are images of the enunciation, the immaculate conception, the birth, and the adoration of Horus.
The images begin with Thaw announcing to the virgin Isis that she will conceive Horus, then Nef the holy ghost impregnating the virgin, and then the virgin birth and the adoration. This is exactly the story of Jesus' miracle conception. In fact, the literary similarities between Jesus and the Egyption religion are staggering.
As I debunked earlier in the Jesus section of this page, I showed that Horus and Jesus had very little in common. I also debunked the ideas of Horus's life revolving around virgin birth, crucifixion, and resurrection. The stories may have a few similarities, but such conclusions could be drawn between most gods, even ones completely unrelated.
Therefore, the above paragraph is absolutely false.
- Skeptic » eSkeptic » February 25, .
- Zeitgeist (film series) - Wikipedia;
- Skeptic Project?
And the plagiarism is continuous. The story of Noah and Noah's Ark is taken directly from tradition. The concept of a Great Flood is ubiquitous throughout the ancient world, with over different cited claims in different periods and times. However, one need look no further for a pre-Christian source than the Epic of Gilgamesh, written in b. This story talks of a Great Flood commanded by God, an Ark with saved animals upon it, and even the release and return of a dove, all held in common with the biblical story, among many other similarities. Indeed, there are many similarities between the story of the Ark and various flood stories that have appeared in nearly every culture and religion in history.
I do not deny the similarities here, by all accounts the story of the ark is probably heavily influenced from a Babylonian tale or a direct copy. This, however, does not imply anything, other than the idea of the entire world flooding and one man saving all animals is a popular story.
If the Bible is on trial for plagiarism of the story of the Ark, why doesn't the film maker mention the other stories as forgeries? And then there is the plagiarized story of Moses. Upon Moses' birth, it is said that he was placed in a reed basket and set adrift in a river in order to avoid infanticide. He was later rescued by a daughter of royalty and raised by her as a Prince. This baby in a basket story was lifted directly from the myth of Sargon of Akkad of around b.
Related christianity astrology zeitgeist
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved